Equity Strategy
26 February 2025
Reporting Season Update – Rejigging our Structural Growth Exposures
The ASX 200 Earnings Backdrop Remains Mixed
 

As we approach the end of reporting season, with ~80% of the ASX 200 having now reported (on a market capitalisation basis), the earnings picture has been mixed with a roughly even split of earnings upgrades and downgrades following results.

Results day volatility has remained elevated through reporting season, as even minor downgrades have been met with outsized share price declines, which has been most prominent across the Banking and Healthcare sectors. 

The major themes that have emerged across the ASX 200 so far this reporting season have included:

  1. Banks: cracks appearing
    after a mixed set of results, evidence is emerging that earnings momentum has turned negative in parts of the sector, with NAB’s result featuring weaker-than-expected NIMs and credit quality, which has driven a sell-off across the sector. See below.
  2. Healthcare: weakness driven by stock specifics –
    large cap healthcare has underperformed this month after consensus earnings misses from CSL (weak vaccine sales) and COH (weak services revenues), tariff cost impacts for FPH (reports in May), and profit taking from RMD following its Q2 EPS beat.
  3. Retail: upgrades already priced in
    trading updates from leading national retailers (WES, JBH) have shown strong sales momentum into 2H25, which has driven EPS upgrades. However, this hasn’t translated to outperformance due to already demanding valuations and high market expectations heading into reporting season.
  4. Building Materials: macro remains tough
    JHX, RWC and REH all highlighted continued softness in both domestic and US repair & remodel activity, which is weighing on volumes. JHX’s internal strength (share gains, cost control) is providing an offset to the tough backdrop.
  5. Insurance: premium tailwinds easing
    each of the ‘big 3’ ASX listed general insurers (IAG, SUN, QBE) showed that premium growth is slowing, with the focus shifting towards volumes to drive top-line growth, suggesting further margin upside will be limited from here.

This report explores some of the major updates from the last week, including the final ‘Big 4 Bank’ quarterly updates from NAB and ANZ, as well as noteworthy results and updates from key Focus Portfolio holdings: Goodman Group, Aristocrat, and HUB24.

The Focus Portfolio has experienced no thesis breaks this reporting season, albeit we have taken this opportunity to trim the portfolio's exposure to Aristocrat and HUB24 on valuation grounds, which has funded an increased position in Goodman Group. 

Figure 1: Focus Portfolio changes
Company Name Ticker Focus Portfolio weight Change
Before After
HUB24 HUB 3.0% 2.0% -1.0%
Aristocrat ALL 4.5% 4.0% -0.5%
Goodman Group GMG 2.5% 4.0% 1.5%

Source: Refinitiv, Wilsons Advisory.

 

Goodman Group – Positioned for Data Centre Tailwinds

Focus Portfolio weighting: 4% (increased from 2.5%)

Goodman Group’s (GMG) 1H25 result was overshadowed by the announcement of a $4.4bn equity raising to fund data centre projects. This is GMG’s first capital raise in 12 years. 

The key takeaway from the result itself was that GMG reiterated its FY25 operating EPS guidance of ~9% growth (vs FY24), albeit this would have increased to +10% were it not for the capital raise. 

The capital raise was surprising, given GMG’s tendency to fund developments with recycled capital. Management’s decision to tap the equity market reflects the higher capital intensity of data centre projects and a higher proportion of originations on the balance sheet. 

However, GMG expressed confidence in its ability to self-fund future data centre developments from a combination of existing liquidity ($6.6bn post raise), retained earnings, equity sell-downs to capital partners (GMG plans to keep equity interests of 30-50%), and a modest amount of leverage. 

Greater visibility into data centre pipeline = greater conviction

After trimming our exposure in July 2024, we are taking this opportunity to increase the portfolio’s weighting in GMG following a period of underperformance (GMG is down 15% from its January high). 

We previously neutralised our position in GMG, primarily due to a lack of visibility into the timing of its data centre developments and the market’s high expectations around near-term data centre earnings. However, GMG has since provided greater detail on its pipeline, which, in conjunction with a bolstered liquidity position, has given us greater conviction in its medium to long-term earnings growth outlook. 

Specifically, GMG has now disclosed eight major projects representing 0.5 GW of power (10% of GMG’s power bank) that are set to commence by June 2026 (with some starting imminently in 2H25). These projects will have an end-value of $10bn and include a mix of:

  • Powered shells (~30% split) – these are partially completed data centres where GMG will construct the building exterior and provide access to basic power utilities and fibre optic connectivity.
  • Fully fitted (‘turnkey’) solutions (~70% split) – assets where GMG will provide and maintain the essential infrastructure required for customers to operate (i.e. power, cooling, security systems), while tenants are fully responsible for all other aspects of their computing infrastructure (i.e. servers, storage, networking equipment). 

Remaining positive towards data centres (and Goodman’s strategy) 

We remain attracted to the data centre sector, given the strong demand tailwinds supported by cloud migration and AI, the scarce supply of well-located assets, and the superior development yields on offer (low-double digit vs mid-single digit for logistical warehouses). 

GMG has a significant competitive advantage, owing to its significant existing land bank and its 5 GW global power bank, which will underpin ~$100bn of developments over the next decade-plus at GMG’s current run-rate. 

Valuation-wise, GMG now trades at a forward PE multiple of 26x, which represents attractive value in the context of sustained double-digit EPS growth over the next 5+ years. Key catalysts over the next 6-12 months will include 1) development starts (driving work-in-progress/development yield increases), 2) hyperscaler commitments, and 3) capital partnerships (sell-downs). 

 
Figure 2: Overview of GMG's data centre development projects
Name Location Power Description
LAX 01 Los Angeles, USA ~50 MW Located in LA metro
TY0 05 & TY0 06 Tokyo, Japan 100 MW First phase of a multi-building 1 GW campus. Flexible design for AI and cloud deployments
SYD 01 Sydney, Aus 90 MW Located in Sydney North Availability Zone
MEL 01 Melbourne, Aus 35 MW First phase of a multi-building campus, proviidng up to 100 MW. Flexible design for cloud and AI deployments
AMS 01 Amsterdam, Netherlands 40 MW Located in highly power constrained and regulated tier 1 market. First phase of two building
PAR 02 Paris, France 80 MW Located in Paris Central Availability Zone. First phase of two building 160 MW campus.
FRA 02 Frankfurt, Germany 50 MW Located in Frankfurt South Availability Zone. First phase of two building 100 MW campus.
HK 10 Hong Kong, SAR China 50 MW Located in Tsuen Wan / Kwai Chung Availability Zone. Redevelopment of existing industrial building.

Source: Company filings, Wilsons Advisory.

Figure 3: Data centre projects now represent 46% of GMG's WIP (work-in-progress), which will rise further as new projects commence
Figure 4: Data centres projects will support double-digit earnings growth over next 5+ years
 
 

HUB24 – Trimming after Strong Run

Focus Portfolio weighting: 2% (reduced from 3%)

HUB24’s (HUB) 1H25 result was a +6% beat to consensus EBITDA, driven by better-than-expected operating margin expansion (+424bps vs the pcp to 39.8% vs consensus of 39%). HUB also upgraded its FY26 FUA target to $123-135bn (previously $115-123bn). 

Overall, HUB’s result was in line with our thesis. We have expected to see consensus upgrades driven by a continuation of positive inflow momentum, combined with operating leverage as investment spend is rationalised and efficiencies are extracted from the cost base.

While we remain attracted towards the quality of HUB and the strength of its medium/long-term earnings outlook, we are taking this opportunity to trim our exposure after a period of outperformance. 

HUB’s forward PE multiple has re-rated materially since being added to the portfolio, with the business now trading at parity with Netwealth at a multiple of ~60x (albeit with stronger EPS growth), thus reducing expected returns over the near-term.

Figure 5: HUB has re-rated materially since it was added to the portfolio
 

Aristocrat – Taking Some Money off the Table

Focus Portfolio weighting: 4% (reduced from 4.5%)

Aristocrat (ALL) held its AGM last week, where the business reaffirmed guidance for NPATA growth in FY25 and made positive outlook statements across its three key segments:

  • Aristocrat Gaming (~60% revenues) – continued strong market share, revenue and profit growth
  • Product Madness (~30% revenues) – disciplined execution with a focus on market share and investment efficiency (focused on the profitable operation of existing evergreen titles with no new game development)
  • Aristocrat Interactive (~10% revenues) – accelerating performance toward its FY29 US$1bn revenue target

The business also announced a new A$750m share buy-back program, which will be modestly accretive to EPS over the medium-term. This follows the receipt of US$600m from the sale of Plarium, after a strategic review of the group’s casual and mid-core social gaming assets. 

Overall, our positive view towards ALL remains unchanged. We remain attracted to its dominant land-based business and the long-term structural growth potential of the online real money gaming sector, both of which can continue to drive consensus upgrades over the medium-term, in our view. 

However, we are taking this opportunity to trim our exposure after a strong run of outperformance, which has driven ALL’s forward PE multiple to one standard deviation above its five-year average. There is still scope for ALL to move higher over the medium-term, with continued positive consensus earnings momentum, but a relatively full valuation has reduced our expected returns over the near-term.

Figure 6: Aristocrat’s forward PE has re-rated slightly above its five-year trading range
 

Banks – Cracks Starting to Appear

Now that each of the major banks have provided updates, there are signs that earnings momentum is starting to turn. While CBA earned modest upgrades, elsewhere in the sector the earnings picture has been more mixed, with NAB being the major disappointment as it reported weaker-than-expected margins and credit quality. 

With ASX 200 Banks trading on a forward PE of ~19x (vs 5yr avg of ~15x), (driven by CBA) and offering only low-single digit EPS growth, the sector has been vulnerable to a correction if earnings disappoint relative to consensus. The Focus Portfolio is ~9% underweight the Big 4 Banks (vs ASX 300), with ANZ and Westpac (WBC) being our preferred exposures.

 
Figure 7: The ‘Big 4 Banks’ have underperformed in February after a mixed set of results

NAB – Weaker Margins, Credit Quality and Balance Sheet

Focus Portfolio weighting: not held (unchanged)

NAB posted a weak 1Q25 update, with cash earnings (-2% vs 2H24 quarterly average) of $1.74bn tracking below (pre-result) 1H25 consensus forecasts of $3.53bn, which has resulted in low single-digit consensus EPS downgrades. 

The key drivers of the result were:

  1. Deteriorating credit quality – in line with NAB’s recent trend, credit impairment charges increased +8% from 4Q24, which appears worse than expected by consensus, while mortgage arrears also appear worse than the other banks. 
  2. Lower NIM – NAB reported a ‘small decline’ in its NIM (net interest margin) due to lending and deposit competition, as well as higher funding costs, which continues its negative trend. 
  3. Softer capital position – the CET1 ratio declined more than expected (-80bps vs 2H24 to 11.6%), driven by an increase in credit risk-weighted assets.
  4. Costs – 1Q25 OPEX increased +2% (vs 2H24 quarterly average), driven by increased staff costs and increased investment spend (aimed to defending its incumbency in business banking). 

NAB's update has reaffirmed our cautious view towards NAB, leaving us comfortable maintaining zero exposure to the bank. With NAB’s ROE superiority vs peers (ex CBA) declining as OPEX and bad debts rise, we continue to see its valuation premium as unwarranted. NAB trades on a forward PE of ~16x (vs ANZ/WBC at ~13/15x) while offering low single-digit EPS medium-term growth in line with peers. 

 

ANZ – Still Our Preferred Bank Exposure

Focus Portfolio weighting: 8% (unchanged)

ANZ’s 1Q25 update contained limited new information. The highlight was lower-than-expected credit loss ratio (CLR) of 2bps (vs consensus of 7cps), which demonstrates resilient credit quality and provides a buffer against consensus for ANZ’s 1H25 EPS.

ANZ remains our preferred bank exposure, given 1) its attractive relative valuation and capital returns profile, 2) expected synergies from the integration of Suncorp Bank, 3) above-system growth in the mortgage market, and 4) expected efficiencies from the rollout of its new tech stack (i.e. ANZ Plus, Transactive). 

ANZ trades at a forward PE of ~13x, which represents attractive value compared to peers. Like the other banks, ANZ offers low single-digit consensus EPS growth over the medium-term. 

Figure 8: Reporting season calendar – key results due over the next week
Company Name Ticker Portfolio weight Date Period
Focus Portfolio holdings
Worley WOR 3% Wed-26-Feb 1H25
WiseTech WTC 2% Wed-26-Feb 1H25
Steadfast SDF 2% Wed-26-Feb 1H25
Other key stocks (not held)
Woolworths WOW - Wed-26-Feb 1H25
Coles COL - Thu-27-Feb 1H25

Source: Company filings, Wilsons Advisory.

 
  • Share This Article

Written by

Greg Burke, Equity Strategist

Greg is an Equity Strategist in the Investment Strategy team at Wilsons Advisory. He is the lead portfolio manager of the Wilsons Advisory Australian Equity Focus Portfolio and is responsible for the ongoing management of the Global Equity Opportunities List.

Disclaimer and Disclosures

About Wilsons Advisory: Wilsons Advisory is a financial advisory firm focused on delivering strategic and investment advice for people with ambition – whether they be a private investor, corporate, fund manager or global institution. Its client-first, whole of firm approach allows Wilsons Advisory to partner with clients for the long-term and provide the wide range of financial and advisory services they may require throughout their financial future. Wilsons Advisory is staff-owned and has offices across Australia.

Disclaimer: This communication has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory and Stockbroking Limited (ACN 010 529 665; AFSL 238375) and/or Wilsons Corporate Finance Limited (ACN 057 547 323; AFSL 238383) (collectively “Wilsons Advisory”). It is being supplied to you solely for your information and no action should be taken on the basis of or in reliance on this communication. To the extent that any information prepared by Wilsons Advisory contains a financial product advice, it is general advice only and has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the appropriateness of the advice in light of your own objectives, financial situation and needs before following or relying on the advice. You should also obtain a copy of, and consider, any relevant disclosure document before making any decision to acquire or dispose of a financial product. Wilsons Advisory's Financial Services Guide is available at wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.

All investments carry risk. Different investment strategies can carry different levels of risk, depending on the assets that make up that strategy. The value of investments and the level of returns will vary. Future returns may differ from past returns and past performance is not a reliable guide to future performance. On that basis, any advice should not be relied on to make any investment decisions without first consulting with your financial adviser. If you do not currently have an adviser, please contact us and we would be happy to connect you with a Wilsons Advisory representative.

To the extent that any specific documents or products are referred to, please also ensure that you obtain the relevant disclosure documents such as Product Disclosure Statement(s), Prospectus(es) and Investment Program(s) before considering any related investments.

Wilsons Advisory and their associates may have received and may continue to receive fees from any company or companies referred to in this communication (the “Companies”) in relation to corporate advisory, underwriting or other professional investment services. Please see relevant Wilsons Advisory disclosures at www.wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.

Related articles