Equity Strategy
18 September 2024
Departing Ways
Webjet is Set to Demerge its B2C and B2B Businesses
 

Webjet (WEB) is in the final stages of demerging its well-known Webjet B2C business (principally the Webjet online travel agent), from its lesser-known - but much larger - B2B business, WebBeds. 

With the demerger now formally approved by shareholders, Webjet B2C (Webjet Group) will commence trading as a separately listed entity next Monday (23/9/2024) on a deferred settlement basis. The B2B business (WEB Travel Group) will retain the existing WEB listing.

Demergers on the ASX have historically created value for shareholders, with both the parent and the spin-off outperforming the ASX 300 on average in the 12 months and 24 months post demerger. 

There is strong rationale for WEB’s looming demerger, which we expect to unlock hidden value for existing WEB shareholders. This is the focus of this report. 

WEB is currently held in the Focus Portfolio at a 3% weight. 

 
 

ASX Spin-Offs Typically Create Shareholder Value

Based on our analysis of major demergers over the last 15 years, on average both the parent entity and the spin-off have outperformed the market in the 12 months and 24 months post demerger. 

Typically, the spin-off has outperformed the parent entity by around 2x (excluding notable outliers) over these time frames. 

This naturally supports a positive view of WEB in the lead up to its scheduled demerger. 

However, as every business and demerger is inherently unique, it is important to review the investment rationale of each entity on a case-by-case basis. This is the approach we have taken towards the WEB demerger (detailed below). 

Figure 1: Spin-offs typically outperform the parent entity
 
Figure 2: Performance of ASX demergers – spin-offs typically outperform the parent entity, but both on average outperform the market
Demerger Company Parent Entity Announced Effective  Time (Days) Relative Performance vs ASX 300
Announcement date to effective date 12 months post demerger 24 months post demerger
Spin off Parent Spin off Parent
Macquarie Atlas Roads Intoll Group 30/10/2009 25/10/2010 87 3% 154% 31% 160%
DuluxGroup Orica 3/5/2010 12/7/2010 70 19% 5% 9% 43% 24%
Treasury Wine Estates Foster's Group 26/5/2010 10/5/2011 349 -6% 35% 45% 39% 30%
Star Group Tabcorp 18/10/2010 6/6/2011 231 18% 23% 20% -42% 5%
Trade Me Fairfax Media 26/8/2011 13/12/2011 109 2% 26% -52% 13% -49%
Region Re Woolworths 5/10/2012 26/11/2012 52 1% -26% -17% -8% -25%
News Corp Twenty-First Century Fox 26/6/2012 19/6/2013 358 30% 6% -14% 3% -6%
Recall Brambles 2/7/2013 10/12/2013 161 -6% 41% 13% 58% 33%
Orora Amcor 1/8/2013 18/12/2013 139 8% 61% 25% 94% 41%
Scentre Group Westfield 4/12/2013 25/6/2014 203 10% 21% 26% 74% 65%
South 32 BHP 24/11/2014 18/5/2015 175 -8% -11% -25% 29% -18%
Clydesdale Bank NAB 7/6/2015 4/2/2016 273 7% -10% -4% -4% -20%
Domain Fairfax Media 22/2/2017 16/11/2017 267 30% -27% -5% -31% 6%
Coles Wesfarmers 16/3/2018 21/11/2018 250 20% -10% 6% 18% 41%
United Malt Group Graincorp 4/4/2019 20/3/2020 351 18% -39% -4% -56% 108%
Deterra Royalties Iluka 20/2/2020 13/11/2020 267 4% -21% 67% -9% 80%
Endeavour Group Woolworths 3/7/2019 25/6/2021 723 13% 32% 7% 6% 12%
The Lottery Corporation Tabcorp 5/7/2021 23/5/2022 322 10% 3% 5% -5% -40%
Abacus Storage King Abacus Property Group 16/2/2023 3/8/2023 168 -2% -5% -23%
Webjet Group WEB Travel Group 22/5/2024 30/9/2024 131 ? ? ? ? ?
Average 9% 14% 6% 21% 17%
Average excluding notable outliers* 9% 10% 1% 19% 7%

*Notable outliers include Macquarie Atlas Roads / Intoll Group, United Malt Group / Graincorp, and Deterra Royalties / Iluka. Source: Company filings, Refinitiv, Wilsons Advisory.

 

The Strong Rationale for WEB’s Demerger

1. WebBeds’ value is underappreciated in WEB’s current market valuation 

Demergers can create shareholder value when individual segments are undervalued by the market due to the presence of a ‘conglomerate discount'. Spin-offs allow investors to more appropriately ascribe value to each segment independently. 

In its current structure, we believe WEB trades on a ‘conglomerate discount’ due to the combination of two distinct segments with different long-term growth profiles: Webjet B2C (more mature, modest growth), and WebBeds (less mature, strong structural growth).

As such, we expect the demerger to drive a re-rate of WEB’s combined (sum-of-the-parts) valuation.

2. Lack of operational synergies or strategic alignment between B2C and B2B segments

In situations where there is a clear lack of interdependency or strategic alignment between the different segments of a business, demergers allow both the parent and the spin-off to focus on pursuing their individual growth strategies, while adopting tailored capital structures that are most appropriate to their unique characteristics. 

In the case of WEB, given its B2B and B2C segments have different growth profiles, independent operations with limited interdependency, and separate management teams, the demerger should be relatively frictionless. 

 
 

Our preference: WEB Travel Group (WebBeds) > Webjet Group

Under the structure of the WEB demerger, the B2B business - WebBeds, will trade under the existing listed entity (under the WEB ticker, albeit renamed to WEB Travel Group), while the B2C business - now named Webjet Group, will trade as a newly listed entity. 

WEB shareholders will retain their existing shareholding in Webjet (albeit renamed to WEB Travel Group), and eligible shareholders will receive one Webjet Group (B2C) share for every WEB share they hold on the Record Date (24/09/2024).

Figure 3: WEB demerger structure
Formal company name Webjet Group WEB Travel Group
Businesses Webjet OTA, GoSee WebBeds
Entity New ASX-listed entity Existing WEB listed entity
Pro forma EBITDA (FY24a) (A$m) $39 $141
Pro forma net cash (31 Mar 2024) (A$m) $48 $303
Listing date 23/9/2024 Already listed
Indicative valuation multiple range (FY25 EV/EBITDA)* 5-7.5x 15-20x
Indicative valuation range* $270-370m $2.6-3.4bn

*Based on the Wilsons Advisory Research team’s analysis. Source: Company filings, Wilsons Advisory.

With respect to the Focus Portfolio’s existing 3% position in WEB, at this stage our bias is to hold only WEB Travel Group (B2B) and to remove Webjet Group (B2C) once it is spun-out, given:

  1. WEB Travel Group (B2B) has a much stronger earnings growth outlook over the near and long-term than Webjet Group (B2C) (consensus EBITDA CAGR to FY30 of 14% vs 5%)
  2. Webjet Group (B2C) has a greater degree of sensitivity to consumer weakness and the risk of a prolonged slowdown in domestic travel spend than WEB Travel Group (B2B).
  3. Webjet Group (B2C) will be below our preferred size/liquidity thresholds for Focus Portfolio holdings, and is at risk of being removed from the ASX 300 index (our research team’s indicative equity value range is ~$270-370m). 
Figure 4: WEB’s demerger will separate the group’s high growth B2B segment from its lower growth B2C segment
 

Webjet Group (B2C) – Less Growth, More Cyclical Risk

Webjet Group (B2C) includes the Webjet online travel agency (OTA) - the largest OTA in Australia and New Zealand, as well as GoSee, which is a small motorhome and car rental business. 

Webjet Group (B2C) is likely to deliver modest (‘mid-single digit’) earnings growth over the medium to long-term, which will be supported by market share gains and the ongoing shift towards online travel bookings.

However, as a relatively mature business, Webjet Group (B2C) is materially exposed to cyclical weakness in travel spend. WEB’s AGM update in late August highlighted that the Webjet OTA is currently seeing subdued domestic demand driven by cost-of-living pressures, which has led to its 1H25 total transaction value (TTV) falling ~10%. 

Everything considered, given Webjet Group’s (B2C) relatively uncompelling growth outlook, and its higher degree of exposure to the cycle (at a time that travel spend is softening), there are downside risks for the business over the near-term. This keeps us cautious towards the business at this juncture. 

 

WEB Travel Group (B2B) – Strong Runway for Growth

WEB Travel Group (B2B) will include the WebBeds business, which is a leading online travel intermediary. The WebBeds Global Marketplace connects hotels (‘travel sellers’) that are looking to fill rooms with ‘travel buyers’ (e.g. OTAs, retail travel agents, tour operators, airlines etc.) that are trying to book rooms for travellers. 

Since WEB was introduced to the Focus Portfolio in April 2024, WebBeds has been central to our investment thesis as the structural growth engine of the combined group. 

Importantly, WebBeds remains on track to achieve its TTV target of A$10bn in FY30, which underpins consensus expectations of highly attractive ('mid-teens') earnings growth over the next decade. 

While WebBeds is not immune to the risk of a potential travel slowdown, its structural growth traits (i.e. its ability to grow ‘above system’) will provide a degree of insulation against the cycle. 

 
Figure 5: WebBeds connects travel sellers with travel buyers
 

The three key pillars of WebBeds’ growth will be: 

1. Growth in existing portfolio (system growth)

The global hotel wholesale market is forecast to grow at a CAGR of ~8% over the next three years, which will be supported by the structural shift towards distribution consolidation as well as general travel market expansion. WebBeds is confident it can grow its TTV from its existing portfolio of travel buyers and hotel partners at least in line with ‘system growth.’

2. New customers, supply, and markets (market share gains)

WebBeds plans to grow its market share by adding new hotels and travel buyers to its marketplace, and by growing its presence in less penetrated markets (with North America expected to be a core growth driver). 

There is a large opportunity with independent hotels, given the fragmented nature of the hotel market. 

Through its partnership model, WebBeds offers significant value to independent hotels to help them compete with the big chains. It acts as their sales, marketing and distribution partner, which lowers their guest acquisition costs. 

WebBeds is also focused on expanding its retail travel agent channel presence, by upgrading its trade booking website with better features.

3. Improved conversion 

WebBeds is focused on improving its conversion rate, to drive a higher number of bookings from online searches. Key drivers of this will include:

  1. AI: efficiency improvements driven by AI adoption.
  2. Pricing: competitive pricing vs the market.
  3. Technology: improving response time and look-to-book ratios.
  4. Mapping: enhancing the quality and relevance of content. 
  5. Rate plans: more choices to cater for preferences and budgets e.g. early bird discounts and non-refundable rates.
  6. Accuracy: minimising technical errors.
Figure 6: WebBeds is on track to hit A$10bn of TTV by FY30, which underpins expectations of 'mid-teens' EBITDA growth
 
 

The Demerger Presents Upside to WEB’s Sum-of-the-Parts Valuation

The WEB demerger is likely to be value accretive for shareholders in our view. 

Based on relevant comps, we expect Webjet Group (B2C) to trade on an EV/EBITDA multiple of 5-7.5x, and WEB Travel Group (B2B) to trade on an EV/EBITDA multiple of 15-20x (albeit there is upside potential to this range given WebBeds’ pure-play focus, high growth rates and attractive margins). 

Under these assumptions, risks are skewed to the upside for WEB’s combined sum-of-the-parts valuation. We note that the high-end of our research team’s indicative valuation range presents 29% upside to WEB’s current share price, while the low-end estimate suggests just -1% downside. 

Figure 7: We expect WEB’s sum-of-the-parts valuation to re-rate higher post demerger, with WEB Travel Group (WebBeds) being the key swing factor

Given the key swing factor in our sum-of-the-parts valuation of the combined group will be the multiple that the market ascribes to WEB Travel Group (B2B), we see little merit in holding Webjet Group (B2C) for an extended period of once it is spun-out.

We note that using the low-end valuation multiple, rather than the high-end multiple, for the B2C segment results in only a ~3% decrease in the group’s combined valuation.

Figure 8: Post-demerger combined equity value scenarios vs current WEB market capitalisation – risks are skewed to the upside
Figure 9: Key dates
Event Date
EGM - shareholder approval (all resolutions passed) Tue 17 Sep
Last date of cum-entitlement trading for the demerger Fri 20 Sep
Webjet Group (B2C) shares commence trading on ASX on a conditional and deferred basis Mon 23 Sep
Demerger record date Tue 24 Sep
Demerger implementation date (completion date) Mon 30 Sep
Webjet Group (B2C) shares commence trading on ASX on a normal settlement basis Tue 01 Oct

Source: Company filings, Wilsons Advisory.

 
  • Share This Article

Written by

Greg Burke, Analyst

Greg is an experienced analyst in the Investment Strategy team. He is the lead portfolio manager of the Wilsons Advisory Australian Equity Focus Portfolio and is responsible for the ongoing management of the Global Equity Opportunities List.

Disclaimer and Disclosures

About Wilsons Advisory: Wilsons Advisory is a financial advisory firm focused on delivering strategic and investment advice for people with ambition – whether they be a private investor, corporate, fund manager or global institution. Its client-first, whole of firm approach allows Wilsons Advisory to partner with clients for the long-term and provide the wide range of financial and advisory services they may require throughout their financial future. Wilsons Advisory is staff-owned and has offices across Australia.

Disclaimer: This communication has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory and Stockbroking Limited (ACN 010 529 665; AFSL 238375) and/or Wilsons Corporate Finance Limited (ACN 057 547 323; AFSL 238383) (collectively “Wilsons Advisory”). It is being supplied to you solely for your information and no action should be taken on the basis of or in reliance on this communication. To the extent that any information prepared by Wilsons Advisory contains a financial product advice, it is general advice only and has been prepared by Wilsons Advisory without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the appropriateness of the advice in light of your own objectives, financial situation and needs before following or relying on the advice. You should also obtain a copy of, and consider, any relevant disclosure document before making any decision to acquire or dispose of a financial product. Wilsons Advisory's Financial Services Guide is available at wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.

All investments carry risk. Different investment strategies can carry different levels of risk, depending on the assets that make up that strategy. The value of investments and the level of returns will vary. Future returns may differ from past returns and past performance is not a reliable guide to future performance. On that basis, any advice should not be relied on to make any investment decisions without first consulting with your financial adviser. If you do not currently have an adviser, please contact us and we would be happy to connect you with a Wilsons Advisory representative.

To the extent that any specific documents or products are referred to, please also ensure that you obtain the relevant disclosure documents such as Product Disclosure Statement(s), Prospectus(es) and Investment Program(s) before considering any related investments.

Wilsons Advisory and their associates may have received and may continue to receive fees from any company or companies referred to in this communication (the “Companies”) in relation to corporate advisory, underwriting or other professional investment services. Please see relevant Wilsons Advisory disclosures at www.wilsonsadvisory.com.au/disclosures.

Related articles